Leadership is tested in moments of crisis. When a nation faces sectarian violence, a true leader steps forward to restore order and reaffirm the values of peace and unity. Yet, once again, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has remained silent as Hindu nationalist groups engage in violence—this time in Nagpur, where clashes over Aurangzeb’s tomb have led to injuries, arrests, and a citywide curfew.
The violence, sparked by demands to demolish the tomb of the 17th-century Mughal ruler, is not an isolated incident. It is part of a larger pattern of Hindu nationalist groups stoking communal tensions, often with little pushback from the government. Modi, as the country’s leader, has a responsibility to condemn this unrest unequivocally. Yet, just as in previous cases, his reluctance to do so raises troubling questions about his priorities.
Since coming to power in 2014, Modi has overseen a political climate where sectarian provocations have become increasingly frequent. The demolition of the Babri mosque in Ayodhya set a precedent, and in recent years, Hindu nationalist groups have escalated demands to reclaim or destroy Muslim sites they claim were built on Hindu temples. The Aurangzeb tomb controversy follows the same pattern: a manufactured outrage, amplified by right-wing rhetoric, and met with government inaction.
When violence erupts over such issues, a leader’s response matters. Modi has often been quick to comment on issues that serve his political agenda. He delivers strong statements on foreign policy, economic growth, and India’s global standing. Yet, when Hindu nationalist groups incite violence, his silence speaks volumes. His failure to denounce these actions emboldens those responsible, sending a signal that they will not face consequences.
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has consistently denied any role in promoting sectarian tensions, but the reality is clear. Right-wing groups aligned with Modi’s party have been at the forefront of these conflicts, pushing divisive narratives that keep religious tensions alive. Modi’s refusal to condemn them is a tacit approval of their actions.
India is a democracy built on the principles of secularism and pluralism. The country’s leadership must uphold these values, not remain silent as they are undermined. If Modi truly wishes to be seen as a leader for all Indians, he must publicly and forcefully reject communal violence—not just in vague, generalized statements, but by calling out those responsible and ensuring accountability.
Silence is not leadership. India deserves better.